The $1.5B AI Fraud That's Reshaping Silicon Valley Like FTX and Byju's
How Builder.ai's spectacular collapse reveals the toxic pattern every investor needs to recognize before the next wave of startup crashes hits
Builder.ai, the Microsoft-backed unicorn valued at $1.5 billion, filed for bankruptcy in May 2025 following revelations of inflated revenues and "AI washing" practices that deceived major investors including Qatar Investment Authority and SoftBank. The collapse represents the largest AI company failure since ChatGPT's launch and has triggered a fundamental shift in AI investment practices, with VCs implementing enhanced due diligence processes and more conservative valuations.
The company's dramatic fall from grace exposed systemic issues in AI investment practices, with analysts calling it a watershed moment that mirrors the cautionary lessons of previous tech bubbles. While direct comparisons to FTX's crypto market impact remain limited, Builder.ai's bankruptcy has catalyzed similar investor soul-searching about hype-driven investing and inadequate due diligence.
Timeline of Builder.ai's dramatic collapse
Builder.ai's unraveling occurred with shocking speed. February 2025 marked the beginning of the end when founder Sachin Dev Duggal was replaced as CEO by Manpreet Ratia from Jungle Ventures, signaling boardroom panic as investor confidence crumbled. March brought devastating internal audit results revealing the company had inflated its 2024 revenue by 340% - claiming $220 million versus actual revenues of just $50 million.
By May 20, 2025, the house of cards collapsed completely when Viola Credit seized $37 million from Builder.ai's accounts, leaving only $5 million in restricted Indian accounts. The company officially announced insolvency proceedings that same day, followed by Chapter 7 bankruptcy filing in Delaware on June 2nd. The collapse eliminated approximately 1,000 jobs across five countries and left customers scrambling to migrate their applications.
The core deception involved "AI washing" on a massive scale - while marketing its "Natasha" AI system as fully autonomous, the platform actually relied on over 700 human engineers in India manually coding projects while being instructed to mimic AI-generated responses. Bloomberg investigations revealed additional "round-tripping" schemes with Indian social media firm VerSe Innovation, where companies billed each other for services never rendered to artificially inflate revenue figures.
Investor reactions expose due diligence failures
The collapse triggered surprisingly muted public responses from major investors, with Microsoft and Qatar Investment Authority remaining largely silent despite losing tens of millions. However, industry experts used the failure as a cautionary tale about the dangers of "FOMO investing" in AI.
"This isn't the first case of disastrous FOMO we've seen over the years. And as AI-washing continues, this won't be the last case," warned Carrie Osman, CEO of private equity advisor Cruxy. She specifically criticized Microsoft and other investors for failing to "capture the true value and ROI from Builder's product and didn't dig below the headlines and hype."
Phil Brunkard from Info-Tech Research Group noted that "Many AI firms rushed to scale on the back of hype, often lacking strong financial controls or truly differentiated offerings." The consensus among analysts is that Builder.ai represents the apex of hype-driven AI investing, where prestigious backing from Microsoft and major sovereign wealth funds substituted for proper technical and financial due diligence.
The human cost proved devastating, with laid-off employees expressing shock on LinkedIn: "It's hard to believe how a company can go from over 1,000 employees to zero." The U.S. Attorney's Office for Southern District of New York has subpoenaed financial records, while the SEC investigates whether Builder.ai misrepresented technological capabilities to investors.
The FTX Parallel: When Crypto's Golden Boy Collapsed
The comparison between Builder.ai and FTX isn't just superficial—it's a blueprint for how single company failures can reshape entire industries.
FTX's Devastating Impact on Crypto (2022-2023):
Market Capitalization Crash: Crypto market value plummeted from $3 trillion peak in November 2021 to a two-year low of $796 billion as FTX imploded
Investment Freeze: U.S. VC crypto investments dropped from $6.12 billion in Q1 2022 to just $704 million in Q3 2022
Industry Confidence Shattered: The disaster set back adoption of crypto assets by "one or two years," with FTX being "one of the most trusted entities in the crypto space"
Contagion Effects: Business partners owed money were forced to shut down, with cryptocurrency exchanges like Crypto.com downsizing due to customer withdrawals
Photo by Mariia Shalabaieva on Unsplash
The Regulatory Crackdown: Gary Gensler of the SEC said investors "need better protection," while law enforcement tightened scrutiny domestically and internationally. The collapse triggered what analysts called a "Lehman moment" for crypto.
Recovery Timeline: Bitcoin has more than doubled in 2023, making it the best year since 2020, but venture investors are now "proceeding with caution".
The Byju's Parallel: How EdTech's $22 Billion Darling Destroyed a Sector
Byju's collapse offers perhaps the closest parallel to Builder.ai's impact on AI investment.
Byju's Catastrophic Fall (2022-2024):
Valuation Apocalypse: Byju's valuation crashed 99% from $22 billion to $225 million in its latest funding round
Revenue Fraud: The company's core loss widened more than 61% despite total income doubling, with delayed financial reports raising concerns
Founder in Exile: CEO Byju Raveendran has not stepped back into India since leaving at the end of 2023, with an Enforcement Directorate lookout circular issued against him
EdTech Sector Devastation:
Investment Collapse: In the first eight months of 2023, edtech startups raised a mere $400 million compared with $2.4 billion in 2022 and over $4 billion in 2021
Industry-Wide Impact: Eruditus, a SoftBank-backed upskilling unicorn, faced a 10% markdown, while Unacademy witnessed a plateau in core revenues post-Covid
Long-term Recovery: The Indian education investment market hit "peak hubris" when Byju's spent $40 million to sponsor the 2022 FIFA World Cup, creating a "frothy market" that international investors are now fleeing
Historical Precedents: The Pattern Repeats
These collapses follow a well-established pattern seen across industries:
Enron's Energy Sector Impact (2001):
Corporate Governance Revolution: The scandal prompted significant regulatory reforms, including the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, aimed at improving corporate governance and accountability
Market Confidence Crisis: Enron's shares went from $90.75 at peak to $0.26 at bankruptcy, affecting over 20,000 employees and shaking Wall Street
Auditing Industry Collapse: Arthur Andersen LLC was found guilty of illegally destroying documents, which voided its license to audit public companies and effectively closed the firm
The Pattern is Clear: Single company failures don't just destroy individual businesses—they reshape entire sectors. The collapse of Enron "shook investor confidence and led to a decline in the stock market" while raising "questions about the integrity of the accounting profession".
The AI investment landscape shows concerning bubble characteristics: AI companies captured 46.4% of total $209 billion VC funding in 2024, with nearly one in four new startups being AI-focused. Extreme valuation concentration has emerged, with AI companies trading at median revenue multiples of 25.8x and some reaching P/S ratios over 40x - levels historically associated with bubble peaks.
Yet critical differences distinguish the current AI boom from previous bubbles. Unlike dot-com era companies, current AI leaders like Microsoft, Google, and Meta demonstrate clear monetization paths and stronger fundamental performance. Tech stocks trade at 31x forward earnings versus 48x during the dot-com peak, suggesting more sustainable underlying economics despite elevated valuations.
Fundamental changes in investment practices
Builder.ai's collapse has triggered measurable changes in AI investment behavior. AI company median revenue multiples decreased from 35x to 25.8x post-collapse, while monthly AI funding dropped 35% from March 2025 peaks. Deal velocity decreased 28% for early-stage AI companies as VCs implemented enhanced scrutiny processes.
The most significant change involves technical due diligence evolution. VCs now mandate comprehensive technical audits for AI companies, with specialized firms like Bridgetown Research raising $19 million specifically for AI-powered due diligence. Investment committees require technical experts for all AI investments exceeding $10 million, while due diligence timelines extended from 6-8 weeks to 10-14 weeks.
Major firms including Sequoia, Andreessen Horowitz, and Google Ventures implemented mandatory technical advisory panels for AI deals. New "red flag" indicators include companies claiming "80%+ AI automation" without demonstrable proof, outsourced development teams without clear oversight, and vague technical explanations of AI capabilities.
Revenue validation processes intensified by 40-60% according to industry reports, with independent audits now required for AI companies claiming over $10 million ARR. The emphasis shifted from "potential-based" to "performance-based" valuations, with increased focus on unit economics and path to profitability.
Sector-specific impacts: When Trust Evaporates, Industries Transform
Builder.ai's collapse has created measurable ripple effects across AI sub-sectors, mirroring how previous mega-failures reshaped their industries.
AI Development and No-Code Platforms Hit Hardest: Companies in "AI-powered development" and "no-code AI" sectors similar to Builder.ai's positioning saw revenue multiples decrease from 40x to 20x, while due diligence periods extended 50% longer. Several stealth-mode AI companies delayed fundraising to strengthen technical validation.
The "Trust Premium" Emerges: The market now pays premiums for companies with proprietary datasets, transparent AI systems, and auditable capabilities, while devaluing companies relying heavily on third-party AI models. Corporate venture capital from Google, Nvidia, and Qualcomm increased activity as traditional VCs showed more selectivity.
Comparing Cross-Industry Impact Patterns:
EdTech After Byju's:
Venture capital investments in India's edtech sector had surged 32-fold over 12 years, growing from $500 million in 2010 to $16.1 billion in 2022
Post-collapse: EdTech funding dropped 83% in 2023 vs 2022 levels
Recovery timeline: The sector is projected to reach $30 billion by 2031, but with fundamentally changed investor behavior
Crypto After FTX:
Pre-collapse: AI companies captured 46.4% of total VC funding in 2024, similar to crypto's dominance in 2021-2022
Impact: Crypto market lost about $2 trillion in value during the "Crypto Winter" of 2022-23
New Reality: "Venture investors are now proceeding with caution" with enhanced due diligence requirements
Energy After Enron:
Market confidence crisis led to comprehensive regulatory overhaul (Sarbanes-Oxley Act)
Arthur Andersen's dissolution removed one of the world's five largest accounting firms
Long-term impact: Enhanced corporate governance standards became permanent fixtures across all industries
Broader market implications and future outlook
Despite Builder.ai's collapse, AI investment remains robust with global funding reaching record $100+ billion in 2024, representing an 80% increase from 2023. However, the approach has fundamentally shifted toward rigorous validation and conservative valuations rather than speculative enthusiasm.
The incident exposed the scale of "AI washing" across the industry, where companies present basic technology services as AI-powered without substantive capabilities. This has led to development of "AI Reality Index" scoring systems that measure actual versus claimed AI capabilities, fundamentally changing how investors evaluate AI startups.
Market concentration remains extreme, with the "Magnificent 7" tech companies responsible for 71% of S&P 500 gains in 2023. While this suggests systematic risk if AI capabilities fail to meet expectations, continued enterprise adoption - with 72% of companies using AI in at least one function - supports underlying demand fundamentals.
The consensus among experts suggests we're transitioning from hype-driven to fundamentally-driven AI investment. While not yet in full bubble territory, the market is entering a rationalization period where only companies with strong fundamentals and clear paths to profitability will attract premium valuations.
The Common Pattern: How Single Failures Create Industry-Wide Reckonings
Looking across these major collapses, a clear pattern emerges that helps predict Builder.ai's lasting impact on AI investment:
Phase 1: The Confidence Crisis (Immediate Impact)
FTX: Crypto market lost $2 trillion in value within months
Byju's: EdTech funding dropped 83% in following year
Enron: Stock went from $90 to $0.26, affecting 20,000+ employees
Builder.ai: AI company median revenue multiples decreased from 35x to 25.8x
Phase 2: The Due Diligence Revolution (6-18 months)
FTX: "Venture investors are now proceeding with caution" with enhanced screening
Byju's: International investors created "frothy market" bubble that burst completely
Enron: Led to Sarbanes-Oxley Act requiring CEO/CFO financial statement certification
Builder.ai: VCs now mandate comprehensive technical audits for AI companies, with due diligence timelines extended from 6-8 weeks to 10-14 weeks
Phase 3: The New Normal (2-5 years)
FTX: While Bitcoin recovered, institutional approaches to crypto permanently changed
Byju's: EdTech sector projected to reach $30 billion by 2031, but with fundamentally different investor behavior
Enron: Corporate governance standards became permanent fixtures across ALL industries
Builder.ai: The consensus suggests we're transitioning from hype-driven to fundamentally-driven AI investment
The Bottom Line: Builder.ai as AI's Defining Moment
Builder.ai's collapse won't kill AI—just like FTX didn't kill crypto, Byju's didn't kill EdTech, and Enron didn't kill energy companies. But it will permanently change how the industry operates.
What This Means for AI Investors:
The Good News: Unlike pure speculative bubbles, AI has demonstrated real business value. Microsoft, Google, and Meta show clear monetization paths, and 72% of companies use AI in at least one function.
The Reality Check: The era of "AI washing" and hype-driven investing is over. As one expert noted: "We're transitioning from hype-driven to fundamentally-driven AI investment."
The New Rules:
Technical validation is mandatory - No more trusting prestigious investor backing as due diligence
Revenue multiples will normalize - The days of 40x+ revenue multiples for AI companies are ending
"AI Reality Index" scoring systems are emerging to measure actual versus claimed AI capabilities
Regulatory oversight will intensify - SEC investigations into AI company claims signal increased scrutiny
Historical Context Provides Hope: Every major industry has survived its defining scandal. Energy survived Enron, crypto is recovering from FTX, and EdTech will emerge stronger after Byju's. The companies that survive the AI "Builder.ai moment" will be the ones that actually deliver real value rather than just promise it.
The question isn't whether AI will survive Builder.ai's collapse—it's whether your favorite AI investment can prove it's not the next Builder.ai.
Thanks for sharing, bhai!
https://youtube.com/shorts/nI9lxnDVTB4?feature=share